USPTO serial 74480474
SUPER X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICARDO, RANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burnsville, MN
EXCELSIOR-HENDERSN MOTORCYCLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Burnsville, MN
Other trademarks owned by EXCELSIOR-HENDERSN MOTORCYCLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Burnsville, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC D. PAULSRUD
ERIC D PAULSRUD LEONARD, ST AND DEINARD150 S FIFTH STSTE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hanlon Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks owned by EXCELSIOR-HENDERSN MOTORCYCLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Hanlon Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SUPER X
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |