USPTO serial 74480689
FREESTYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREESTYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manny D. Pokotilow
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN, ET AL12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | sportswear, namely skirts, blouses, pants, shirts, jackets, vests, shorts, and anoraks | ABANDONED | May 2, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |