USPTO serial 74481842
GREEN GARDEN GANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN GARDEN GANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bridgetown, Barbados, BB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J. FRENCH
DAVID J FRENCHP O BOX 2486, STN DOTTAWA, ON K1P 5W6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetic signs; eyeglasses, sunglasses and frames thereof; safety goggles, protective helmets; baseball, football, and hockey helmets; visual media, namely motion picture, cinematographic, and video films, tapes, cassettes, discs, and optical viewers for three-dimensional graphic representations and pictorial inserts therefor, all featuring children's story themes; radios; motion picture, cinematographic, and photographic cameras; telephones; telescopes; photographic slide transparencies assembled to relate stories for children; kaleidoscopes, software featuring children's toy publications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |