USPTO serial 74482554
MERCURY MESSENGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERCURY MESSENGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Florists' Transworld Delivery Association
Southfield, MI
Other trademarks owned by Florists' Transworld Delivery Association
FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
BINGHAM FARMS, MI
Other trademarks owned by FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
BINGHAM FARMS, MI
Other trademarks owned by FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN DICKINSON, WRIGHT, MOON, ET AL2401 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for facilitating communications on a computer network integrating point of sale and wire service communications processing in the field of purchase orders and delivery orders for flowers, floral arrangements, plants, fruit, gift orders, and florist products, settlements and payments in account therefor, message sending, distribution of news information, and advertising of florist products by suppliers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Florists' Transworld Delivery Association
- Other trademarks owned by FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MERCURY MESSENGER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |