USPTO serial 74483386
HUNGRY TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUNGRY TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William R. Cohrs
WILLIAM R COHRS EXXON MOBIL CORPORATIONLAW DEPT5959 LAS COLINAS BLVDIRVING, TX 75039-2298Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail convenience store services rendered only at gasoline stations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |