USPTO serial 74483395
SEAFOOD SENSATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUEHLING, EVERETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEAFOOD SENSATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LUNENBURG, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Diamante
JOSEPH DIAMANTE PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fresh and frozen prepared seafood and shellfish | ABANDONED | Jan 26, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1996 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |