USPTO serial 74485510
FAMILY PC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAMILY PC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
N. Sioux City, SD
N. Sioux City, SD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Beran
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD& GERALDSON311 S WACKER DR SUTIE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers, computer monitors, computer keyboards, computer mouse, and other computer peripherals, computer disk drives and computer instruction manuals sold therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | Jul 27, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |