USPTO serial 74485793
MULTI FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTI FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned E. Barlas
NED E BARLAS BLANK, ROME, COMISKY & MCCAULEY1200 FOUR PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal syrup transfer tanks, sold empty; carbon dioxide cylinders, sold empty | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | carbonators, and bar guns | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | soft drink concentrates, namely syrups; juice concentrates; premixed soft drink mixes | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | leasing of beverage dispensing equipment and wholesale distributorship of beverage concentrates, namely postmix beverage syrups, postmixed juice concentrates, premixed beverage mixes, premixes and carbonic gas | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gottlieb, Bernie
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MULTI FLOW
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |