Drawing for STREAMLINE

USPTO serial 74485799

STREAMLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STREAMLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard N. Stapler, Jr.

RICHARD N STAPLER JR THE LEGAL DEPTTHE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC3600 BANK OF OKLAHOMA TWRTULSA, OK 74172

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing access to computer databases for buying and selling with respect to forward contracts in the field of energy, gas and other commoditiesABANDONEDSep 6, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 1997PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 3, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 4, 1996CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 22, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1995SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 11, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance