USPTO serial 74485816
ICESCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICESCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Computer Talk Technology, Inc.
Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3P4, CA
Computer Talk Technology, Inc.
Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3P4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Paul Reiner
JOHN PUAL REINER WHITE & CASE1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for distributing telephone calls and caller database information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 1996 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |