USPTO serial 74485941
DECATHLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2865860Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 2004
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DECATHLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
59650 Villeneuve D'Ascq, FR
59650 Villeneuve D'Ascq, FR
59650 Villeneuve D'Ascq, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGIL H MARSH
VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER CHRISTEN & SABOL1019 19TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in any other classes, namely, horological and chronometric instruments, namely, clocks, chronometers, cufflinks, tie pins, and sun dials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Typewriter paper, staples for offices, drawings pens and pencils, pencil sharpeners, pencils, rubber erasers, card and document files, wall calendars, and adhesive tape dispensers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |