USPTO serial 74485998
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID P. BRANFMAN
DAVID P BRANFMAN12750 HIGH BLUFF DRSTE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92130| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and manuals, licensed as a unit, in the field of managing wholesale distributorships | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |