USPTO serial 74486393
MINIMUM TOTAL TRANSACTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 1997
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MINIMUM TOTAL TRANSACTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bedford Heights, OH
Bedford Heights, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick R. Roche
PATRICK R ROCHE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | distributorship services for industrial fasteners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 4, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Mar 18, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| May 23, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | โ |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Oct 28, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | โ |
| Sep 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jul 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |