Drawing for DIVE!

USPTO serial 74488075

DIVE!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVE!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNE V PELLEGRINI

ANNE V PELLEGRINI KIRKLAND & ELLIS200 E RANDOLPH DR STE 6100CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant, bar and nightclub services all featuring a simulated submarine environment and all featuring the presentation of films and video-tapes thereinABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 1998EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 7, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 14, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 9, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 23, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 21, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 9, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 1996OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 1996OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance