USPTO serial 74488123
SPLITFIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MASIELLO, ANTHO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPLITFIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Northbrook, IL
Northbrook, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Thomas Sylke
C THOMAS SYLKE WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK SCSTE 2100, 111 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | automotive parts, namely electrical ignitions; optical ignitions; crank fire ignitions; electrical vehicle ignition parts, namely magnetos; ignition distributors; ignition parts for internal combustion engines, namely distributor caps, distributor rotors, ignition points, ignition condensers, ballast resistors and reluctors | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electrical components of automotive ignitions, namely ignition coils, ignition modules for controlling ignition parameters such as triggering, spark advance, duration and timing, ignition wires, pick-up coils, ignition triggering switches, capacitive discharge ignition controls, and ignition computer chips | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |