USPTO serial 74489543
CITYSCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITYSCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Casselberry, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian C. McLeod
IAN C MCLEOD2190 COMMONS PKWYOKEMOS, MI 48864UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | maps | ABANDONED | Nov 17, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 19, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |