USPTO serial 74489711
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles A. Laff
CHARLES A LAFF LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books, namely series of action fiction books painting and coloring sets for children, and posters | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | all-purpose sports bags | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely jackets, pants, sweaters, shirts, and athletic shoes | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | toys and games, namely board games, jigsaw puzzles, dolls, bath toys, toy movie viewers, video games on cassettes, discs, CD-Roms and cartridges, model vehicles, die cast toy figures and vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely the production and distribution of a television series | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |