USPTO serial 74489747
POWER READING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER READING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta T5S 1S7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. HOLT
WILLIAM H HOLT WILLIAM H HOLT1423 POWHATAN STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | recorded video cassettes, computer programs, and recorded compact disks; reading improvement and encouragement programs, exercises and/or courses supplied on video cassettes and/or compact disks and/or in printed materials; video and written materials sold as a unit for teaching or improving or encouraging reading; computer disks and written materials sold as a unit for teaching or improving or encouraging reading; children's educational video programs; video literacy programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | books and other printed materials for teaching or improving reading skills and encouraging reading; printed literacy programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | arranging and conducting seminars on reading and reading techniques; providing courses of instruction in reading and literacy skills, and distributing instructional video, audio and printed materials in connection therewith; production of children's video programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |