USPTO serial 74490807
INTEGRITY SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2084240Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 1997
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRITY SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brady, TX
Integrity Training Systems, Inc.
Brady, TX
Brady, TX
Brady, TX
INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, LLC
PHOENIX, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack A. Kanz
JACK A KANZ502 S COTTONWOOD DRRICHARDSON, TX 75080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed instructional materials in the form of books and pamphlets featuring information on how to educate others on a variety of topics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrity Training Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named INTEGRITY SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |