Drawing for AIRACCESS

USPTO serial 74491078

AIRACCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRACCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary M. Hamaker

MARY M HAMAKER AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INCLEGAL DEPT - 21ST FLONE CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical apparatus, namely telephones and pagersEXPIRED—
038wireless voice and wireless data telecommunications services, namely cellular, paging, and switching and transmission services for the carriage and provision of access to various information servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 1995ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 21, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 29, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance