USPTO serial 74491245
FELICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FELICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | contactless card system, comprising a credit card sized-card featuring an integrated circuit chip and battery which is read by a contactless reading machine for use as railway tickets, credit and identification cards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |