Drawing for DRAGON

USPTO serial 74491988

DRAGON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DRAGON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANICE A SHARP

JANICE A SHARP MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL ET AL11150 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 400LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-3395UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic automotive audio equipment, namely, amplifiers, loudspeakers, radios, audio tape players, CD players, equalizers, crossovers, digital to analog processor and analog to digital processorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 13, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 2, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 15, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 1995UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 14, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance