Drawing for STARFLEET ACADEMY

USPTO serial 74492403

STARFLEET ACADEMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STARFLEET ACADEMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee Parnell

LEE PARNELL PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION5555 MELROSE AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028computer programs for video and computer games and instruction manuals sold as a unitABANDONEDOct 15, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 30, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 15, 1997EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 4, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 6, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 8, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance