USPTO serial 74492703
MICROSKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROSKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Freeland, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Uhlir
JAMES R UHLIR CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, ET AL1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | skis and ski poles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |