USPTO serial 74492717
BSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, JEFFERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountlake Terrace, WA
LONDON, GB
London, GB
Mountlake Terrace, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAIVA K. TAUTVYLAS
DAIVA K TAUTVYLAS CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motorcycles, small jet-propelled boats for recreational use, snowmobiles, all terrain vehicles, namely three and four wheel off road motorcycles, and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Norton Motors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTON MOTORS (1993) LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BSA Motorcycles Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Norton Motors, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BSA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |