USPTO serial 74493019
COOL SPRING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2000
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOL SPRING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS P KEHLER
THOMAS P KEHLER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | flavoured juices, carbonated soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks, distilled water for drinking, filtered water for drinking, and spring water for drinking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |