USPTO serial 74494019
BRANCH POINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRANCH POINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph M. Tener
RALPH M TENER TENER & CALLAHAN, PC8280 GREENSBORO DR STE 730MCLEAN, VA 22102-3807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for analysis, processing, display, visualization, modelling and solution of scientific equations, formulae and data, for analysis, processing, display, visualization, modelling and solution of engineering equations, formulae and data, for engineering design and analysis, for use in connection with commodities trading, for accounting, for financial reporting, planning, analysis and management, for graphics and graphics design, and for project planning and management; computer programs which incorporate object-oriented tools, utilities, components and technologies; computer programs for training and evaluating persons in the use and development of software; and user manuals provided therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1997 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |