USPTO serial 74494266
MICROBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE R. HEFTER
LAURENCE R HEFTER FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT& DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for wide area network telecommunications systems using cell relay and frame relay technologies to manage a combination of voice, synchronous and asynchronous data and local area network (LAN) data from different multiplexers in a network to maintain a high efficiency in the network over a wide range of variable line rates | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |