USPTO serial 74494385
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
48340 AMOREBIETA (Vizcaya), ES
48340 AMOREBIETA (Vizcaya), ES
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Just
DAVID L JUST LUCAS & JUST205 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | tools for use in power operated machines, namely drill bits and milling cutters | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |