USPTO serial 74495042
SUPREMEVALUE ROPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1909539Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 1, 1995
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPREMEVALUE ROPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BURBANK, CA
Burbank, CA
TAMARAC, FL
Burbank, CA
Burbank, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Elliot
132 Sands Point DriveTierra Verde, FL 33715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | simulated diamond cut jewelry rope chain | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 9, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AURAFIN-OROAMERICA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OROAMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AURAFIN LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OROAMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OroAmerica, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named SUPREMEVALUE ROPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 28, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |