USPTO serial 74495302
AIRSTRIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRSTRIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Anacortes, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Hughes
ROBERT B HUGHES HUGHES & SCHACHT, PS1720 IOWA STBELLINGHAM, WA 98226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | fireworks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARVIN WILBUR, JOAN WILBUR, LENORA WILBUR, MARVIN WILBUR, Jr. and MICHAEL WILBUR, all U.S. citizens, as trustees of the Salish Trust
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named AIRSTRIKE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |