USPTO serial 74495806
ASPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dobung-ku, Seoul, KR
Dobung-ku, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Kolasch
JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH8110 GATEHOUSE RDSTE 500 EFALLS CHURCH, VA 22042Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages; namely, soft drinks, sports drinks, mineral and aerated water | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |