USPTO serial 74495820
JADE MOUNTAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JADE MOUNTAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve Rosenblatt
STEVE ROSENBLATT ROSENBLATT & ASSOCIATES PCONE GREENWAY PLZ STE 500HOUSTON, TX 77046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | fresh fruits, namely green bell peppers, jalapeno peppers, pasilla chili peppers, purple bell peppers, red bell peppers, serrano peppers, pineapple, bananas, quince, banana squash, zucchini squash, strawberries, sugar cane, tangelos, cantaloupe, coconut, eggplant, guava, honeydew melons, kiwi, kumquats, lemons, limes, mangoes, casaba melons, crenshaw melons, oranges, papayas, fresh vegetables; namely, taro root, mushrooms, onions, kohlrabi, alfalfa sprouts, asparagus, bamboo shoots, bean sprouts, Chinese beans, snow peas, bok choy, broccoli, cabbage, carrots, celery, chives, leeks; fresh nuts, namely, peanuts, cashews, walnuts, and almonds | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |