USPTO serial 74495995
SEGENIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEGENIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Gooder
DAVID S GOODER GRAHAM & JAMES801 S FIGUEROA, 14TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5554UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | transplantable biological tissues and cells, hormones, cytokines and monoclonal antibodies all for the treatment of blood, human organs and for related therapeutic applications | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | liver dialysis machines and bioreactors therefor; medical diffusion chambers for blood filtration and growth of transplantable tissues and cells | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SEGENIX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |