USPTO serial 74496533
ADVANCED COMPOSITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEORGE, ANIL V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANCED COMPOSITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Waynesboro, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth P. George
KENNETH P GEORGE AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | non-woven fabrics made from polyolefins | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |