Drawing for ADVANCED COMPOSITES

USPTO serial 74496533

ADVANCED COMPOSITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, ANIL V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANCED COMPOSITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth P. George

KENNETH P GEORGE AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024non-woven fabrics made from polyolefinsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 30, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 25, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 18, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 28, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 18, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 25, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 13, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance