USPTO serial 74496647
SUNDIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNDIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marshall G. MacFarlane
MARSHALL G MACFARLANE LAW OFFICE KRASS & YOUNG, PC3001 W BIG HEAVEN RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, sunglass frames, and parts and fittings for eyeglasses, sunglasses, eyeglass frames and sunglass frames | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |