USPTO serial 74497194
MASTER CRAFT PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTER CRAFT PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MINNETONKA, MN
MINNETONKA, MN
MINNETONKA, MN
Minnetonka, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Knoll
MICHAEL J KNOLL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal tool chests and roller cabinets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PETTERS GROUP WORLDWIDE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FAC ACQUISITION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FAC ACQUISITION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Fingerhut Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named MASTER CRAFT PRO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |