USPTO serial 74497854
CHALLENGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHALLENGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert O. Fox
ROBERT O FOX LUEDEKA, NEELY & GRAHAM, PC1030 FIRST AMERICAN CTR 507 GAY STKNOXVILLE, TN 37902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | martial arts supplies; namely, punching bags, gloves, protective pads in the form of chops and kicks, shin and instep guards, chest guards, head guards, rib guards, mitts, shields and kicking targets | ABANDONED | Apr 27, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |