USPTO serial 74498511
KIDS CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIDS CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of a concert | ABANDONED | Feb 13, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |