Drawing for CERTIFIED SOFTWARE MANAGER

USPTO serial 74498601

CERTIFIED SOFTWARE MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERTIFIED SOFTWARE MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
Bsoftware asset and licensing managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 26, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 18, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 2, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 2, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 20, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 17, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 17, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 17, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 8, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance