USPTO serial 74498699
CERTIFIED SOFTWARE MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERTIFIED SOFTWARE MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1100 NEW YORK AVE N WSTE 300 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational and testing services in the field of software asset and licensing management, including training courses in managing software assets, training in understanding copyright law, licensing agreements, the audit process, the benefits and processes of software asset management and developing a corporate software policy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |