USPTO serial 74501546
RITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 1999
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
West Conshohocken, PA
Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
West Conshohocken, PA
Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
West Conshohocken, PA
Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. A. Earley III
JOHN F. A. EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY, P.C.1288 Valley Forge Road, PO BOX 75086 The Commons at Valley Forge EastVALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named RITZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 5, 2019 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |