Drawing for STEWART ELECTRONICS

USPTO serial 74503251

STEWART ELECTRONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BILLINGS, JESSIE W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEWART ELECTRONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

THOMAS I ROZSAIMPERIAL BANK BLDG STE 108115303 VENTURA BLVDSHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009professional electronic audio products; namely, power amplifiers, distribution amplifiers, preamplifiers, mixers, digital-to-analog converters, power supplies, speaker connectors, and impedance matching and single polarity matching electronic interface boxABANDONEDNov 16, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 6, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 27, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 21, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance