USPTO serial 74504091
HARLEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARLEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip H. Gottfried
PHILIP H GOTTFRIED AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, aftershave lotion; antiperspirant; artificial eyelashes; artificial fingernails; bath powder; bath salt; beauty mask; blusher; body lotion; body oil; body powder; bubble bath; cold cream; cologne; cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; cuticle removing preparation; dentifrices; electric pre-shave lotion; emery boards; eye makeup; eye makeup remover; facial makeup; facial scrub; hair conditioner; hair dressing for men; hair dye; hair rinse; hair shampoo; hair spray; hand lotion; hand soap; lip gloss; lipstick; mouthwash; nail hardener; nail polish; nail strengthener; night cream. perfume; personal deodorant; rouge; shave cream; shower gel; skin cleansing cream; skin emollient; skin moisturizer; skin toner; suntan lotion; talcum powder; toilet soap; toilet water; and toothpaste | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | binoculars; contact lens cases; contact lenses; eyeglass cases; eyeglass chains; eyeglass frames; eyeglass lenses; eyeglasses; parts for eyeglasses; parts for sunglasses; spectacles; sunglasses | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | athletic bags; attache cases; baby carriers worn on the body; backpacks; beach bags; beach umbrellas; billfolds; book bags; briefcase-type portfolios; briefcases; business card cases; carry-on bags; non-motorized collapsible luggage carts; change purses; clutch bags; clutch purses; coin purses; cosmetic cases sold empty; credit card cases; diaper bags; document cases; drawstring pouches; duffel bags; fanny packs; felt pouches; garment bags for travel; golf umbrellas; gym bags; handbags; hat boxes for travel; key cases; knapsacks; luggage; overnight bags; overnight cases; parasols passport cases, holders or wallets; patio umbrellas; pocketbooks; purses; satchels; school bags; shoebags for travel; leather shopping bags; mesh shopping bags; textile shopping bags; shoulder bags; all-purpose sports bags; sportsman's hunting bags; suitcases; toiletry cases sold empty; tote bags; travel bags; trunks for traveling; umbrellas; valises; vanity cases sold empty; waist packs; walking canes for non-medical purposes; and , wallets | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail clothing store services; and, restaurant services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KENAR ENTERPRISES, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HARLEM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |