USPTO serial 74504169
RAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Langhorne, PA
Langhorne, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT, PRICE & RHOADS4000 BELL ATLANTIC TWR1717 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2793Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | biological insecticide for agricultural use | ABANDONED | May 31, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |