Drawing for WHITE CAP

USPTO serial 74504788

WHITE CAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WHITE CAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Alex

JOHN L ALEX LOCKWOOD, ALEX, FITZGIBBON & CUMMINGSTHREE FIRST NATIONAL PLZSTE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal closure caps for containers and bottles sold to producers of food and beverage productsABANDONED—
020non-metal closure caps for containers and bottles sold to producers of food and beverage productsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 1997ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 1997EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 14, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance