USPTO serial 74505039
FOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne M. Kennard
WAYNE M KENNARD HALE AND DORR60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical equipment used in the field of radiation treatment therapy, namely two and three dimensional radiation treatment planning systems comprising an interactive, multi-tasking computer and peripherals; interactive medical equipment for two and three dimensional radiation treatment planning comprising an interative, multi-tasking computer and peripherals; and medical equipment comprising an interactive, multi-tasking computer and peripherals that provide two and three dimensional radiation treatment planning which include two and three dimensional evaluation tools | ABANDONED | Aug 16, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |