USPTO serial 74506799
ROSSINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 1996
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROSSINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2390 AB Hazerswoude, Holland, NL
1424 PL DE KWAKEL, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. PECK, PHD
JOHN W PECK, PHD CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | living plants, parts of plants and flowers of roses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 1997 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 11, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |