USPTO serial 74506965
TORONTO RAPTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TORONTO RAPTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Professional Basketball Franchise
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 9G9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terese R. Cohen
TERESE R COHEN NBA PROPERTIES, INCOLYMPIC TWR BLDG645 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of basketball games and basketball exhibitions rendered live and in stadia and through the mdia of radio and television broadcasts; the production and distribution of radio and television broadcasts of basketball games and basketball exhibitions; mascot and dance teams performances; conducting and arranging basketbal clinics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |