Drawing for TORONTO RAPTORS

USPTO serial 74506966

TORONTO RAPTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORONTO RAPTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terese R. Cohen

TERESE R COHEN NBA PROPERTIES, INCOLYMPIC TWR BLDG645 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys and sporting goods; namely, basketballs, golf balls, playgrounds balls, sports balls, rubber action balls and foam action balls, basketball nets, basketball backboards, pumps for inflating basketballs and needle therefor, golf clubs, golf bags, computerized basketball table game machines, video game cartridges, video game machines, basketball table top games, basketball board games, electronic video arcade game machines, basketball kit consisting of a basketball net and whistle, dolls, stuffed toys, jigsaw puzzles and Christmas tree ornamentsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Nov 21, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 5, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Feb 22, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 7, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 15, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 21, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1995CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 1, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 17, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance